Why on earth would you assume the author wants blacks to have "priority in every sitaution"? As I read it-as an older white guy- The author is simply saying that black people should not be put in situations where they are A) treated as though they are a rare success in an otherwise failed or inherently inferior race; B) Told that "they are (some) of the good ones" in a way that implies that most of the other "ones" are unworthy or unacceptable, or outright dangerous ones; C) expected to endorse a narrative that holds that any success by any black person should be used as an indictment of everyone in that community who has not, for whatever reason, had the same success- even if that lack of success on the part of others has nothing whatsoever to do with the merits of either those other black people as individuals or the black community as an entity; D)Put under pressure to distance themselves from the rest of the black community- in other words, forcing them to treat the black community as something that "successful, acceptable" black people should feel obligated to feel ashamed of and to endorse the white idea that the black community is somehow collectively "less" than the white community, and E) In so doing be forced to make themselves outsiders, suspected of snobbery and disloyalty by the rest of the black community.

Is it really so much to ask that white people not subject black people to any of that?