None of the Hillary Obsessives think they need to provide evidence for any of their positions, or make an actual case for why Hillary SHOULD have been the Democratic nominee in the past or should be again- btw, to those who think the Democrats should ever renominated anybody: does the name "Adlai Stevenson" mean anything to you?- they simply think she is ENTITLED to a second nomination, no matter what.

Some of them still think she should have been imposed as nominee over Obama in '08. even though she almost certainly would have lost.

It's about entitlement for entitlement's sake, and nothing else.

If these people had had their way, every presidential campaign for the first quarter of this century would have been somebody with the last name "Clinton" against somebody with the last name "Bush". And they actually think that kind of choice- an endless replication of the 1992 campaign- would matter.